• Bicycle Accidents
• Birth Injury and Birth Trauma
• Cancer Misdiagnosis
• Car Accidents
• Construction Accidents
• Dog Bites
• Medical Malpractice Cases
• Medical Prescription Errors
• Motorcycle Accidents
• Nursing Home Abuse and Neglect
• Others’ Negligence
• Product Liability
• Property Liability Cases
• Slip and Fall Cases
• Surgical Mistakes
• Traumatic Brain Injury
• Wrongful Death

• Independent Attorney Ratings Community Resources

Newswire - Most recent posts

Some Of Our Actual Legal Cases

Jackpot Awards On Medical Malpractice Crisis?

I recently read about a trial that took place in Montgomery County.  When I saw the amount of the jury verdict, it got me thinking about all this discussion we’ve been hearing lately about a medical malpractice crisis and runaway jury verdicts.  What the public is lead to believe by the insurance companies is that jurors cannot be trusted to give reasonable verdicts and that their awards amount to jackpot lottery winnings for injured malpractice victims.  Folks – the large jury award is highly unusual but is published in the newspaper and, therefore, we hear about it.  We don’t hear about the normal jury verdict in medical malpractice cases which are anything but a jackpot.

In the Montgomery County case, a 63 year old woman was treated in a hospital emergency room with classic complaints of a heart problem.  She was discharged with a diagnosis of abdominal symptoms.  She returned to the hospital the next day but died shortly thereafter of a fatal heart attack.  At the time of trial, only her adult children were in attendance.  Her husband had died shortly before the trial started.  The jury found that the emergency room doctor was 100% at fault.  What did they award her family for the death of their mother who was 63 years of age?   Did they get a jackpot lottery award like the insurance companies would have you believe?

The jury awarded the plaintiff’s family the sum of $100,000.00.  Under Pennsylvania law, damages in a death case are limited to pain and suffering, wage loss, and loss of services to the surviving family members.  What are our politicians doing about a court system that allows a life to be worth only $100,000?       Stephen M. Karp, Esquire

It’s Beyond Dispute – Cell Phones And Driving Don’t Mix

I am currently prosecuting on behalf of my client, an automobile accident case involving the use of a cell phone by another driver who we believe was sending and receiving text messages at the time of the accident.  The accident occurred when the driver crossed the centerline of a highway forcing my client to take evasive action which caused him to wind up in a ditch.

The other driver continued on her way.  An eyewitness saw the erratic driving and thought it was as a result of her being intoxicated despite the fact that this incident occurred during early morning hours.  He used his cell phone to call the police. (Ironic?)

The police eventually pulled the woman over but she passed the breathalyzer test with flying colors.  However, the  officer noticed that her cell phone was laying on the driver’s seat.  This information was added to the police report.

Since there had been no vehicle to vehicle contact and she vehemently denied that she was crossing the centerline it was going to be a tough case to win.

Her telephone records which were subpoenaed revealed, however,  that she had been sending and receiving  text messages during the time in question.  Clearly, we will now be able to show that her attention was likely not on the road.   This should make the case easier to win for my client.

It is presently legal in Pennsylvania to use a cell phone while operating a motor vehicle.  Hopefully this will change soon.  In other states, it is illegal to use a cell phone while driving.  Where there is a statute this conduct is called “negligence per se” and as such a person is automatically determined to be negligent without further proof.  Unfortunately, in Pennsylvania we still must prove that not only was the defendant using the cell phone at the time of the accident but that the cell phone was preventing her from safely operating her motor vehicle.  Although, this may seem like a fine distinction to the lay person, it is crucial to prove a causal connection between the use of a phone and the actual injury in order to win.   Here is an example of just what can happen.  This avoidable accident occurred on August 14, 2009.

Please read the article in the Daily Local News from the District Attorney for Chester County Joseph W. Carroll for more proof. http://www.dailylocal.com/articles/2010/02/23/opinion/srv0000007650981.txt

Philadlephia Inquirer
Posted on Sat, Aug. 15, 2009
2 LEAVING DELCO HOSPITAL HIT BY CAR; 1 DEAD
By Mari A. Schaefer – Inquirer Staff Writer

A 20-year-old driver who police said was distracted by her iPod yesterday struck two young women – best friends – who had just walked out of Delaware County Memorial Hospital, killing one.  Archbishop Prendergast High School staffers preparing for the fall term heard the commotion and later learned the two were former students at the school.  Nicole Gallo, 19, of Clifton Heights, and Christine Bochanski, 20, of Lansdowne, left the hospital at 11:15 a.m. and were struck from behind by the car, said Michael J. Chitwood, Upper Darby police superintendent.  Gallo was killed instantly; Bochanski was stabilized at the hospital and then transferred to Crozer-Chester Medical Center. Chitwood said she was in “extremely critical condition.”  The driver, Rachel Jankins of Havertown, was treated for minor injuries at Delaware County Memorial, he said.

Chitwood said no charges had been filed but the investigation continued.  According to police, Jankins was heading south on Lansdowne Avenue when she lost control of her 2003 Hyundai Accent, crossed two lanes of traffic, traveled up onto the sidewalk for 30 feet, and struck the women. The car became trapped between a large tree and a brick wall. There were no skid marks, police said.  “Her claim is, she was reaching down for the iPod, wasn’t paying attention, and lost control of the car,” Chitwood said. He called the accident “a tragedy that happened because of stupidity and inattentive driving.”

Gallo was a 2008 graduate of Prendergast, and was a member of the Lebanon Valley College track and field team last year as a freshman.  Bochanski, also a 2008 Prendergast graduate, was a cheerleader and on the student council while at the Delaware County school.  The news spread quickly through the Prendergast community as former and current students texted one another, principal William Brannick said.  “It hit us like a ton of bricks,” said Brannick, who was still trying to reach some members of the staff. He said the two women were involved in a number of activities while at the school.

Anthony Carr, Prendergast’s track coach, said he heard the news while training with the team at a camp in New Jersey.
“In the four years [Gallo] was on our track team, she always showed up with a smile on her face,” he said.

Gallo was not tall, but never let that deter her from being a quality hurdler, he said, adding, “She was a hurdler from Day One.”  “Our girls right now are having a difficult time,” Carr said, noting that many current athletes had known Gallo and Bochanski since grade school. He said they planned to go to a nearby church to pray for both women.  Gallo “was a very hardworking, very conscientious student athlete, just the kind of kid you want on your campus,” said Rick Beard, director of athletics at Lebanon Valley. “We are deeply saddened by this news. It is tragic.”   Peter J. Hart, Esquire

John And Mary – Car Accident Due To Icy Conditions

If you travel north on Route 29 near Phoenixville, Chester County, you’ll see that it’s a narrow, curving roadway. If you look carefully, you’ll notice remnants of a makeshift memorial that was placed on the side of the roadway several years ago. Let me tell you a story about that memorial.

John and Mary were married for more than fifty years and had five grown children and many grandchildren. John loved to work in his wood shop. Mary was an artist and enjoyed making ceramics.

One wintry morning, they were driving to Phoenixville. An empty school bus coming over a hill skidded and drove directly into John and Mary’s car. John died instantly just a few feet from where the memorial wreath now lies. Mary was airlifted to the hospital but died later that day.

When the family came to see me several months later and asked me what the value of the case was, I told them the truth – I didn’t know – I couldn’t comprehend their loss. What was the value of the death of John and Mary?

Neither I nor the adjuster for the bus company could agree on a fair settlement so we mutually selected a lawyer to arbitrate the claim and make a decision. Under Pennsylvania law, his award was limited to a short period of pain and suffering in addition to the loss of companionship, tutelage and guidance which even grown children suffer when a parent dies. The arbitration award served as a legacy for John and Mary’s children and grandchildren.

Whenever I drive to Phoenixville and pass the spot where the accident took place, I still remember John and Mary and their dedication to each other and their children.     Stephen M. Karp, Esquire

The Squirrel – Car Crash, Serious Personal Injuries Due To Stupidity

I’ve been representing people involved in personal injury cases for over thirty-five years. When I’m asked what my craziest case is, I don’t have to think twice – here it is.

Jill was taking a leisurely drive in the rolling hills near Honey Brook, Chester County when her boyfriend abruptly stopped the car. He had seen a dead squirrel laying in the middle of the road. He then decided to impress Jill so he picked up the squirrel – got back into the driver’s seat – and put the squirrel on his lap. He started up the car and began to shake the squirrel’s tail. There was only one thing he overlooked – the squirrel wasn’t totally dead. Not only that, but the squirrel didn’t take kindly to his tail being jerked back and forth so he bit the boyfriend – in the lap. This unexpected and painful experience caused the boyfriend to lose control of the car causing it to veer off the road and strike a tree. Jill sustained a fracture of the right arm. When she came into my office and told me the story – I asked her to repeat it.

Who did I sue and what settlement did Jill receive?

Unfortunately for Jill, her boyfriend only had a $25,000 automobile liability insurance policy. The squirrel had no auto insurance coverage at all – oh by the way – Jill dumped her boyfriend for someone with a bit more maturity.     Stephen M. Karp, Esquire